This may sound crazy to some but I feel everything about the pandemic has Al written all over it.
I'm convinced the pandemic was pre-conceptualized by humans who ran the entire event through Al programming. Asked it to simulate the best most convincing way to pull it off. Al wrote the script Fauci & Co carried it out.
Even now the things going on, what Fauci says (he won’t shut up) are all part of a larger picture. We don't see it because we are being cleverly out witted by programming that is running in the background that understands how to trigger the human psyche.
Chat GPT-4 is only the civilian version. The elite have access to servers running AI that dwarf Chat GPT. Humanity is at a stage where machines are shaping their perceptions and hijacking their futures.
While we focus on dangers posed by vaccines we may be ignoring the real experiment going on. As Mr. Couey rightfully points out at face value nothing makes sense.
What does make sense is this whole event is a test, could AI write a detailed intellectual strategy of powerful manipulation to get most people to give up their rights, roll up their sleeves and take an experimental biological agent? My feeling is, you bet your ass it did. And it’s still evolving.
AIs most nefarious but militarily useful purpose is to influence, mislead, manipulate, control, and conquer minds.
It occurs to me the Pandemic was an amazing test of its power. Most of us few dissenters have been blown away by how fast and effectively our friends, family, neighbors and coworkers dropped all semblance of logic and marched to its drum.
Microsoft has a huge stake in AI. Did Bill Gates make billions off the vaccines? Or would it be more accurate to say he made billions off AI of which the vaccines played a starring role?
The Pandemic could’ve easily been the 21st century equivalent of the first nuclear tests. That may be why Trump has not openly criticized it. He knows it’s rooted in national security. If we don’t get a handle on its power our adversaries certainly will.
I think it’s quite possible that most of us have been misled to focus solely on biology when really the entire pandemic was a military exercise to test the power of AI.
How far can AI push people to give up everything they supposedly stand for and get them to think they’re acting rationally when clearly they’re not if the right buttons are pressed?
AI’s predictive programming can write humanity’s script in real-time. It is the most powerful weapon ever created.
So who thinks the military industrial complex isn’t interested? Who thinks they wouldn’t pull off this entire event as a test to see if giant swaths of people can be goaded to surrender their will? If they can get under the hood and tinker with the engines victory is possible with nary a shot fired.
That’s why biologically nothing makes sense. The pandemic really wasn’t about biology. It was about asking AI to create a scenario that’d manipulate people to jump through hoops they normally wouldn’t. See if it works and how far it could go.
Great comment. I've been making the same point to a couple friends who sent me an article about the dangers of AI. I made the case that it's already been happening, and this conversation about its dangers is a ruse. The way algorithms work on the internet is AI, and they've been very successful manipulating people and people's perceptions. The big companies (google, Facebook) have already been harming the public with this technology, and they are now discussing ethical concerns about AI as a way to cover what they've already been doing. "Behavioral nudging" is a way algorithms and AI works, and so many organizations talk positively about it, and it's really a psychological manipulation tool.
AI won’t create an embodied mind. But it can create an embedded mind. Highly influential and still very dangerous.
Be careful saying it’s a fraud. It is doubtful it can ever reach human sentient, but it can achieve a digitized form of it that is good enough to wreak havoc in new and remarkable ways if not attenuated.
Dr Couey has hypothesized the PCR tests were a scheme to capture billions of samples of human DNA.
I have no doubt those samples are being inputted along with reams of behavioral, demographic, health and who knows what else they’ve captured through back door keyboard data logging for the express purpose of feeding powerful algorithmic databases to parse out information that allows the programmers to know us better than we know ourselves.
On that score, yes, AI is a psychological manipulation tool. So is TV for that matter. And, TVs influence has been similarly disregarded yet it’s the basis by which most people’s opinions are formed.
In conclusion I agree Artificial Intelligence will never come anywhere near the dizzying complexity of the human body. But it can calculate astronomically complex equations at the speed of light, never forget, and never age. So it has some advantages we should be wary of.
To me, GLKs "embedded mind" means that the ideas and beliefs get embedded in our minds. This already happens, people learn their beliefs and ideas from somewhere - from what other people have said, from what is read in books, from what is seen on TV, etc. We rarely form ideas of our own, they are all taken from the ideas that are already out there.
Before the computer era, we had to connect ourselves with the book or the radio. The book and radio were offering one thing, and we are free to take it in or not.
In the computer era, when we open a source of information, it's not offering one thing to everyone. The algorithms cater to each interest, learn what grasps that person's attention then offers that type of information to keep the attention, and steers the person. The algorithms also operates on our psychological patterns and vulnerabilities. Each of these are used to the algorithms greatest advantage, capturing our attention and our psychological patterning so certain ideas and beliefs more easily become our own.
In the past, the ideas from books and other people also get embedded in our mind. But the manipulative tools of algorithms and AI will be even more successful at doing this.
This is blunt but the way I see it frightened people were penetrated *under threat* by a human who plunged a liquid deep inside their bodies that triggered a biologic action that was lethal to some, damaging to others, and of unknown consequences to the rest. None of those insertions were done out of love and none lived up to their promises. All 5.5 billion that took the covid shots were raped. I’m sorry but that is a fact. A fact that should make people very, very angry. But, I dunno? We’ll see.
At minimum, people did not have informed consent and were not given true information by the corporate media, the government or a majority of doctors and nurses. Many people did take it under serious threat. So many of us lived through what it was like to not take it under threat, and it was really hard.
Rape has a specific sexual connotation, but the trauma of rape does affect every cell in the body, just as this injection does (or at least most of these injections it appears).
Thanks. Your politeness is appreciated. When I say embedded I know it conjures images of a physical device implant. But minds are embedded in a myriad of ways.
Elon Musk has effectively painted an image of Neuralink as being something akin to Yondu from Guardians of the Galaxy. Once again I defer to JJ Couey who said, Musk is bamboozling us. We are way past the necessity for physical implants. “Chipping” the brain is done by injectables. No major surgery necessary.
I trust Couey because I think he’s a good, caring, intelligent (slightly eccentric) man and his specialty is neurobiology. He knows the field.
That said, none of this whiz bang technology is anything more than the logical progression of the most primitive forms of mass communication. In the 20th century Orson Wells famous radio broadcast was a demonstration of a mass communication device embedding minds with dissonance.
Otherwise rational people were scared out of their wits over an implausible alien invasion. And that was before television. Before Social Media. Before AI. My suspicious mind ponders whether War of the Worlds was an accident? Or was Wells compensated handsomely for the experiment? But I digress.
Normies can’t step inside an evil mind. That is their weakness. People, particularly when they’re relatively comfortable with the distractions inside their life bubble just cannot fathom why power is so intoxicating. To them it’s a waste of time. People, again, to their detriment always assume everyone thinks essentially like they do. That’s why when Americans encounter different cultures that do not share the same values they always make excuses.
Money fixes everything, right? People everywhere are at their core all the same, right? The same excuse mongering applies to the nefarious in our own back yard. Bill Gates can’t be that bad, right? Nobody’s really listening to the Schwab and Harari shit show, right? Biden wouldn’t really sell America out to China, right? They wouldn’t really try to murder and control us via mass penetration of a biological agent would they? It all seems so idiotic doesn’t it?
Klaus Schwab recently said we live in the era of the polycrises. What he’s not openly saying is all the noise they’re deliberately embedding us with is by design. It’s meant to disrupt and destabilize so that people rely on the reptilian portion of their brains. I’m not sure why but when faced with the uncertainty of Black Death I’m compelled to horde toilet paper. (!) The fact is, to build back to utopian betterment they must destroy everything first.
AI is a powerful tool in the kit. It’s computational speed puts humans at a disadvantage. And it can crunch data points at the speed of light and arrive at behavioral conclusions without coloring them with emotions. The more finite data it’s given the better it can “know” us. It’s not intelligence in the sense of the swirling complex biological and spiritual interplay of humanity. But we need to acknowledge it has certain capabilities that exceed our own.
“Know thy enemy” comes to mind.
Because AI needs data and lots of it, a light bulb goes off as to why the relatively recent pull away from computer viruses (remember those?) and push toward keylogging spyware. John MacAfee pointed out the anti-virus software he invented has long been rendered unnecessary. He said the industry for data capture accelerated from nothing to a staggering Trillion dollars in ten years. This is far more lucrative than viruses. He said keylogging spyware is virtually undetectable and it’s on almost every device. The two largest customers for such data are governments and the military.
Nobody wants to admit it but Chinese owned and controlled Pornhub is bigger that Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram combined. If you’ve been on it (and it appears almost everyone has) then your device has been infected by keylogging software running in the background. The old Internet adage applies, “When something is free the product is you.” It doesn’t matter if it’s a Porn site or a weather app. Your habits are being captured. You’re being studied.
This capturing doesn’t begin with your sexual deviancy and end with texts to your spouse to pick up some milk on the way home. It now includes your DNA. Again, Jonathan Couey, bless his heart, pontificates on how the PCR testing could have been used to capture the largest most diverse population of DNA sampling in the history of the world.
There’s only one explanation for capturing our DNA and combining it with the minutae of our seemingly innocuous behaviors. I mean, who cares, right? There’s no doubt all this data is being fed into the most powerful bank of Supercomputers known to humanity. Because with enough data…maybe now…maybe later, there will be programming powerful enough to understand us right down to our deepest thoughts, habits, and desires. And, it will use that understanding to embed minds with strategies that will alter the course of entire countries without firing a shot.
I think largely that’s what the Pandemic was all about. Our reactions were being tested against predictive programming. Behaviors studied. Tweaks made. They’ve learned much since War of the Worlds. They penetrated 5.5 billion people with a serum that killed, maimed and left the rest with uncertain futures. You gotta admit that was one helluva feat. One things for certain, there’s more to come.
Do you think they are throttling our energy consumption i.a. because they need the energy for their AI infrastructure?
If this is all run and autocorrected in real time by AI, it would mean that by way of substack articles and Twitter they can induce us to input our changing assessments of events, our evolving theories in real time into their ongoing calculations. Rolling out this chat AI in many applications at this point in time increases their chances of gathering and exploiting and factoring in our reaction and state of mind. Then, it would be better to become more tight-lipped. Even though that too harms us. Tricky situation.
I think you're right, AI and algorithms receive our data in and can immediately act upon what it receives. People are psychologically vulnerable to it in a couple ways. One is that people don't recognize how much their thoughts come from other places already. People take in information and feel like they've developed those thoughts on their own, but most all our thoughts and the knowledge has been learned our whole life. People need to wake up to where, and how, they're learning it from. Information that turns into peoples' deeply held beliefs can be packaged in manipulative ways, preying on people's good nature and values. Since the information people take in are connected to their own values, it's hard to discern that they shouldn't swallow the belief in its entirety. Secondly people want to be accepted and even admired, so when negativity is pointed their way thru algorithms, there are a lot of people who will buckle, or as you say just be silent. It's too much for their sense of self to be seen negatively. This was studied to manipulate people to take the transfections for example, and it's being used in climate change and systemic issues. You are right, it is a tricky situation.
Tricky indeed. The more you learn about AI particularly when thinking in terms of the military version which makes Chat GPT look like a kindergarten toy. (A toy that passed a Wharton MBA exam with a B) the more you understand how powerful it’s influence and problem solving really is.
People succumb for many reasons. At the grass roots level it is because they’ve been suckered into a tailor made paradigm fed to them that once accepted their ego will not allow them to let go. At high levels they tinker with it and us to achieve a predetermined outcome knowing consequences are nil.
I used to dismiss AI as akin to Siri or Alexa on steroids. No. It’s way more advanced than that. Musk said there are only a few gigantic AI server farms feeding very powerful computers. He said you can see their heat signature from space. It won’t be long when none of us will know what’s true.
Another “kindergarten” program that came out recently can record a mere 30 seconds of your conversation and reassemble your words with accurate tonal inflections to make you say something you never said. Or never meant to say. Undetectable.
These are just the basic toys. The power that AI wields to influence society is off the charts. We underestimate it at our peril. There’s no doubt in my mind the Pandemic was a test of its powers.
For many years now it’s been no secret our data has been captured and sold. A multibillion dollar industry.
Most of us including me had no idea why. Targeted advertising was the broad explanation.
Snowden, McAfee, and others have pointed out that intelligence gathering has been off the charts.
Again, I’d shrug it off because my life is pretty boring. I used to make a joke about how my data would put them to sleep. I mean, why the rush to gather mountains of data on average, boring law abiding citizens?
Now the answer is emerging. The more data AI is fed the more powerful it gets. AI must know every last detail about each and every one of us.
That’s how it figures out how to persuade us to give up our rights, our faith, our beliefs, fears, hopes, dreams and reshapes them in whatever paradigm is programmed by its masters.
That is why data collection has exploded. That’s why it’s so valuable. That’s why we are currently up to our eyeballs in manipulation and most still don’t see it.
AI must know you. Everything about you. Then it can calculate at the speed of light how to make you its willing puppet. You’ll never see it coming. You’ll be convinced your thoughts are your own. And, you will be wrong.
AI learns to manipulate by digesting conflict data. There isn’t a whole lot to gain from people living a peaceful existence.
For that reason I think most of the seemingly nonsensical conflicts that’ve sprung up seemingly out of nowhere from a culture of so-called “Woke” are not coincidental.
Much can be learned from pitting people against each other, and positing lunacy as fact.
Yuval Harari said, “Jesus is fake news.” “Humans are hackable animals” “AI will render most humans obsolete”
Klaus Schwab said “You will own nothing and be happy”
Listen to what they’re saying. Evidently they see Jesus/Christianity as a threat. They’re confident AI will erase your willpower and necessity for existence. And, once all is said and done whomever remains will be happy campers.
These people are rich, powerful narcissistic nihilists with many, many followers. And they’re making no secret they are coming for us.
I agree, I think a lot of the conflict is being created online. I don't think a majority of people have that same conflict in their daily lives, but they're given the perception that it's all around them.
I do feel spiritual connection, values and discernment is our way through this. I think that's part of the reason why Christianity is being directly attacked by people like Harari. The other part is they want to uproot all other sources of deeply- rooted values and beliefs, so the WEF and co. can inject their own values and beliefs.
Excellent! I’ve been thinking the same thing.. we’re being continuously distracted by virus/no virus, Malone good/Malone bad, CIA mind games, gender anger, etc. seems to me like we’re being sucked into the wrong wormholes. There’s a bigger plot in it all. I think you sum it up well!
Right, it's not that those discussions are not needed and valuable, but we can't get so engaged in those that we lose sight of the bigger picture happening.
That really is interesting. Here’s several things that I notice.
Before talking about the mortality dip, I noticed that all countries start at zero at 2018, then they spread out from one another. I find that hard to believe, but maybe it is true, I’d have to see the source data on everyone starting at zero excess deaths.
Comparing the mortality dip with the two years before, most countries don't show a big difference. If you look at the lowest point of the mortality dip and compare that to the lowest point in the two years before, there isn't much of a difference in most countries. For most of the countries this dip looks like normal variability. Sweden looks to have the widest dip compared with the two years before, which means less people died in the first months of 2020. It's interesting that Sweden was the only country in Europe that did not have harmful authoritarian responses to the viral outbreak. Did that have something to do with it?
Since most countries didn’t have big changes in their excess deaths during the dip, even though they all dipped at the same time, I'm not sure this warrants a complex theory to explain it. I think these are all countries in europe, and they are affected by similar seasonal patterns.
It's my understanding that all countries go through seasonal changes in excess deaths. Excess mortality is higher in their winter months, and add mortality in their summer months . Lack of vitamin D production, being inside with other people, less activity, and other things might play a factor. Of course if countries have a natural disaster, or a war, there will be more excess deaths.
It's also helpful to understand what's called the pull forward effect. If a population has a spike in deaths for several years, that is usually followed by a couple years of less people dying than average. This is because the population already lost people early, that would have been dying a few years later.
When the author says covid-19 (I assume he’s talking about the coronavirus) embeds at a latent level, I think that's a possibility. I've heard Epstein-Barr does that. I don't agree that our immune systems are naive though. There are trillions of cells in our body interacting with trillions of genetic material in our environment with every breath we take, and with everything we touch. This is a constant and evolving relationship. Even when we get sick it doesn’t mean that our immune cells are naïve to a pathogen. There are often other stresses in the body and environment that increase symptoms of illness, but doesn't mean that we haven't seen the pathogen, or a part of the pathogen, before. If we travel to a different country, then our immune systems will be naive to what people have evolved to handle already in that country.
The author makes some bulleted points as a part of the theory. I don't think the second point is necessarily true, and other points after that are related to it being true. That is RNA cleaving enables it to enter cells more easily. He gives a source for this statement that is more about the effect of UV light, and the sources in vitro, which is so much different than what happens in the whole system of trillions of cells coordinating every second of every day in our body. Also, not all genetic material enters are cells. Sometimes our killer cells are macrophages encounter it and just break it down.
So those are my main impressions. How does that land with you? Do other things stand out for you?
Brilliant explanation. I have been trying to wrap my head around this for a long while. It adds value to my theory and does not disprove any of it - I think.
I speculate that various bugs were doing the rounds as they do all the time. Then along comes 5G and amplifies absolutely every sickness ever known to man. Some of these diseases develop quickly and some slowly. For example, it amplified colds and flus in the early days so that they turned into pneumonia and became deadly. It quickly wiped out those who could not tolerate the 5G frequencies - mostly old people whose "dirty electricity" tolerance is lower.
But then the diseases that develop more slowly followed. There has been a massive upsurge in diseases like diabetes, the rest of metabolic syndrome, heart issues, blood clots, various cancers and other viral issues like shingles, which disable and kill more slowly. All of these diseases are vulnerable to disturbance of the body's electrical control and communication systems which is what 5G plays havoc with. This is long covid, which to my mind has nothing whatever to do with the residual effects of any cold or flu and everything to do with long term damage being done to the body wholesale by 5G.
The timing for this is perfect. At the same time that the supposed pandemic occurred, 5G was rolled out and switched on around the world. While the world was locked down, there were teams with free passes installing 5G everywhere. The first places it was switched on had the worst initial hospitalisation numbers, but these hospitalizations and deaths have not let up. My theory, that 5G makes every weakness we already have much much worse, could account for the phenomenal variety of symptoms experienced by those who go down with apparently wild covid and those for whom illness lingers on with long covid.
So where do the injections come into this? Well, not everyone is electro-sensitive. My personal theory is that those with high levels of mercury, lead, aluminium etc are electro-sensitives and are easily affected by dirty electricity et al. So what do the injections do? Introduce electrical conductors of various kinds to ensure that bodies that were previously not vulnerable to "death by 5G" become vulnerable.
Too many tangents for most to be able to hold in their heads simultaneously and see the bigger picture - the interplay between a cold or flu and every other disease known to man, with 5G that affects electro-sensitives, and jabs to make more people electro-sensitive. Can you draw this one?
Wonderful, I'm so glad it was helpful. Explaining step by step with pictures seems to really help understanding.
Right now I'm in the middle of a big stack on the Alison McDowell's research. It turned out to be a much bigger project than I anticipated. I'm headed into the third phase of this stack, which is about synthetic biology and transhumanism. I think 5G will make it into a couple slides, and I'm creating an accompanying video with one clip showing the human created electromagnetic field we exist in now.
5G may indeed interact with the shots. People have found a lot of metals in them, as well as evidence for nanotubes and quantum dots. I've been electromagnetic sensitive, and it got a little better with a heavy metal cleanse, so I think you're right, it has to do with how many metals are built up in the body.
There have been many studies showing the ill effects of 5G. I also noticed that Wuhan, New York and that city in Italy all had already rolled out 5G (and Wuhan had an incredible amount of pollution). Like you say, there are several avenues for 5G to affect people. Even if they don't feel it, it's moving through their body, and so much of our body functions through ion exchange and mini electrical currents. I don't see how it doesn't affect people's baseline health, worsen any pre-existing condition, weakens the body to fight off new conditions, and it possibly will interact with synthetic biology. So I think you're right. But for people who don't feel it, it's really tough to get them to recognize the possibilities.
Oh dear, I am now realising the limitations of Substack. Of recent times I have been simply going through my Substack inbox to see the state of play around the world, and I confess, I had not come across Alison McDowell. So thankyou for the introduction. I will have to pay more attention to cross posting articles about or by people not yet on Substack.
I have told so many people about the 5G blanket rollout to selected cities including Wuhan, Lombardy and some unknown city in South America co-inciding with the apparent outbreak of covid. Few are listening though.
Yes, the whole 5G was pushed on the world in a similar way the injections were, which is a big red flag. I live in California. A city council in San Diego tried to refuse 5G, but I think the federal gov overruled them - it can't be refused. There's no reason for that, most people don't need 5G speeds, so it's another troubling sign of totalitarianism. Along with cameras on every major corner, total surveillance. Since most people can't feel 5G, and it doesn't immediately affect their health, it's really hard for people to get concerned.
I think Allison's research is one of the most important, but it's really hard to enter into her videos and writing without some simplifying explanations and framing. There are so many details she keeps in her head and didn't explain fully each time she says them.
This may sound crazy to some but I feel everything about the pandemic has Al written all over it.
I'm convinced the pandemic was pre-conceptualized by humans who ran the entire event through Al programming. Asked it to simulate the best most convincing way to pull it off. Al wrote the script Fauci & Co carried it out.
Even now the things going on, what Fauci says (he won’t shut up) are all part of a larger picture. We don't see it because we are being cleverly out witted by programming that is running in the background that understands how to trigger the human psyche.
Chat GPT-4 is only the civilian version. The elite have access to servers running AI that dwarf Chat GPT. Humanity is at a stage where machines are shaping their perceptions and hijacking their futures.
While we focus on dangers posed by vaccines we may be ignoring the real experiment going on. As Mr. Couey rightfully points out at face value nothing makes sense.
What does make sense is this whole event is a test, could AI write a detailed intellectual strategy of powerful manipulation to get most people to give up their rights, roll up their sleeves and take an experimental biological agent? My feeling is, you bet your ass it did. And it’s still evolving.
AIs most nefarious but militarily useful purpose is to influence, mislead, manipulate, control, and conquer minds.
It occurs to me the Pandemic was an amazing test of its power. Most of us few dissenters have been blown away by how fast and effectively our friends, family, neighbors and coworkers dropped all semblance of logic and marched to its drum.
Microsoft has a huge stake in AI. Did Bill Gates make billions off the vaccines? Or would it be more accurate to say he made billions off AI of which the vaccines played a starring role?
The Pandemic could’ve easily been the 21st century equivalent of the first nuclear tests. That may be why Trump has not openly criticized it. He knows it’s rooted in national security. If we don’t get a handle on its power our adversaries certainly will.
I think it’s quite possible that most of us have been misled to focus solely on biology when really the entire pandemic was a military exercise to test the power of AI.
How far can AI push people to give up everything they supposedly stand for and get them to think they’re acting rationally when clearly they’re not if the right buttons are pressed?
AI’s predictive programming can write humanity’s script in real-time. It is the most powerful weapon ever created.
So who thinks the military industrial complex isn’t interested? Who thinks they wouldn’t pull off this entire event as a test to see if giant swaths of people can be goaded to surrender their will? If they can get under the hood and tinker with the engines victory is possible with nary a shot fired.
That’s why biologically nothing makes sense. The pandemic really wasn’t about biology. It was about asking AI to create a scenario that’d manipulate people to jump through hoops they normally wouldn’t. See if it works and how far it could go.
Great comment. I've been making the same point to a couple friends who sent me an article about the dangers of AI. I made the case that it's already been happening, and this conversation about its dangers is a ruse. The way algorithms work on the internet is AI, and they've been very successful manipulating people and people's perceptions. The big companies (google, Facebook) have already been harming the public with this technology, and they are now discussing ethical concerns about AI as a way to cover what they've already been doing. "Behavioral nudging" is a way algorithms and AI works, and so many organizations talk positively about it, and it's really a psychological manipulation tool.
AI won’t create an embodied mind. But it can create an embedded mind. Highly influential and still very dangerous.
Be careful saying it’s a fraud. It is doubtful it can ever reach human sentient, but it can achieve a digitized form of it that is good enough to wreak havoc in new and remarkable ways if not attenuated.
Dr Couey has hypothesized the PCR tests were a scheme to capture billions of samples of human DNA.
I have no doubt those samples are being inputted along with reams of behavioral, demographic, health and who knows what else they’ve captured through back door keyboard data logging for the express purpose of feeding powerful algorithmic databases to parse out information that allows the programmers to know us better than we know ourselves.
On that score, yes, AI is a psychological manipulation tool. So is TV for that matter. And, TVs influence has been similarly disregarded yet it’s the basis by which most people’s opinions are formed.
In conclusion I agree Artificial Intelligence will never come anywhere near the dizzying complexity of the human body. But it can calculate astronomically complex equations at the speed of light, never forget, and never age. So it has some advantages we should be wary of.
To me, GLKs "embedded mind" means that the ideas and beliefs get embedded in our minds. This already happens, people learn their beliefs and ideas from somewhere - from what other people have said, from what is read in books, from what is seen on TV, etc. We rarely form ideas of our own, they are all taken from the ideas that are already out there.
Before the computer era, we had to connect ourselves with the book or the radio. The book and radio were offering one thing, and we are free to take it in or not.
In the computer era, when we open a source of information, it's not offering one thing to everyone. The algorithms cater to each interest, learn what grasps that person's attention then offers that type of information to keep the attention, and steers the person. The algorithms also operates on our psychological patterns and vulnerabilities. Each of these are used to the algorithms greatest advantage, capturing our attention and our psychological patterning so certain ideas and beliefs more easily become our own.
In the past, the ideas from books and other people also get embedded in our mind. But the manipulative tools of algorithms and AI will be even more successful at doing this.
This is blunt but the way I see it frightened people were penetrated *under threat* by a human who plunged a liquid deep inside their bodies that triggered a biologic action that was lethal to some, damaging to others, and of unknown consequences to the rest. None of those insertions were done out of love and none lived up to their promises. All 5.5 billion that took the covid shots were raped. I’m sorry but that is a fact. A fact that should make people very, very angry. But, I dunno? We’ll see.
At minimum, people did not have informed consent and were not given true information by the corporate media, the government or a majority of doctors and nurses. Many people did take it under serious threat. So many of us lived through what it was like to not take it under threat, and it was really hard.
Rape has a specific sexual connotation, but the trauma of rape does affect every cell in the body, just as this injection does (or at least most of these injections it appears).
Thanks. Your politeness is appreciated. When I say embedded I know it conjures images of a physical device implant. But minds are embedded in a myriad of ways.
Elon Musk has effectively painted an image of Neuralink as being something akin to Yondu from Guardians of the Galaxy. Once again I defer to JJ Couey who said, Musk is bamboozling us. We are way past the necessity for physical implants. “Chipping” the brain is done by injectables. No major surgery necessary.
I trust Couey because I think he’s a good, caring, intelligent (slightly eccentric) man and his specialty is neurobiology. He knows the field.
That said, none of this whiz bang technology is anything more than the logical progression of the most primitive forms of mass communication. In the 20th century Orson Wells famous radio broadcast was a demonstration of a mass communication device embedding minds with dissonance.
Otherwise rational people were scared out of their wits over an implausible alien invasion. And that was before television. Before Social Media. Before AI. My suspicious mind ponders whether War of the Worlds was an accident? Or was Wells compensated handsomely for the experiment? But I digress.
Normies can’t step inside an evil mind. That is their weakness. People, particularly when they’re relatively comfortable with the distractions inside their life bubble just cannot fathom why power is so intoxicating. To them it’s a waste of time. People, again, to their detriment always assume everyone thinks essentially like they do. That’s why when Americans encounter different cultures that do not share the same values they always make excuses.
Money fixes everything, right? People everywhere are at their core all the same, right? The same excuse mongering applies to the nefarious in our own back yard. Bill Gates can’t be that bad, right? Nobody’s really listening to the Schwab and Harari shit show, right? Biden wouldn’t really sell America out to China, right? They wouldn’t really try to murder and control us via mass penetration of a biological agent would they? It all seems so idiotic doesn’t it?
Klaus Schwab recently said we live in the era of the polycrises. What he’s not openly saying is all the noise they’re deliberately embedding us with is by design. It’s meant to disrupt and destabilize so that people rely on the reptilian portion of their brains. I’m not sure why but when faced with the uncertainty of Black Death I’m compelled to horde toilet paper. (!) The fact is, to build back to utopian betterment they must destroy everything first.
AI is a powerful tool in the kit. It’s computational speed puts humans at a disadvantage. And it can crunch data points at the speed of light and arrive at behavioral conclusions without coloring them with emotions. The more finite data it’s given the better it can “know” us. It’s not intelligence in the sense of the swirling complex biological and spiritual interplay of humanity. But we need to acknowledge it has certain capabilities that exceed our own.
“Know thy enemy” comes to mind.
Because AI needs data and lots of it, a light bulb goes off as to why the relatively recent pull away from computer viruses (remember those?) and push toward keylogging spyware. John MacAfee pointed out the anti-virus software he invented has long been rendered unnecessary. He said the industry for data capture accelerated from nothing to a staggering Trillion dollars in ten years. This is far more lucrative than viruses. He said keylogging spyware is virtually undetectable and it’s on almost every device. The two largest customers for such data are governments and the military.
Nobody wants to admit it but Chinese owned and controlled Pornhub is bigger that Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram combined. If you’ve been on it (and it appears almost everyone has) then your device has been infected by keylogging software running in the background. The old Internet adage applies, “When something is free the product is you.” It doesn’t matter if it’s a Porn site or a weather app. Your habits are being captured. You’re being studied.
This capturing doesn’t begin with your sexual deviancy and end with texts to your spouse to pick up some milk on the way home. It now includes your DNA. Again, Jonathan Couey, bless his heart, pontificates on how the PCR testing could have been used to capture the largest most diverse population of DNA sampling in the history of the world.
There’s only one explanation for capturing our DNA and combining it with the minutae of our seemingly innocuous behaviors. I mean, who cares, right? There’s no doubt all this data is being fed into the most powerful bank of Supercomputers known to humanity. Because with enough data…maybe now…maybe later, there will be programming powerful enough to understand us right down to our deepest thoughts, habits, and desires. And, it will use that understanding to embed minds with strategies that will alter the course of entire countries without firing a shot.
I think largely that’s what the Pandemic was all about. Our reactions were being tested against predictive programming. Behaviors studied. Tweaks made. They’ve learned much since War of the Worlds. They penetrated 5.5 billion people with a serum that killed, maimed and left the rest with uncertain futures. You gotta admit that was one helluva feat. One things for certain, there’s more to come.
Very compelling! This is it.
Do you think they are throttling our energy consumption i.a. because they need the energy for their AI infrastructure?
If this is all run and autocorrected in real time by AI, it would mean that by way of substack articles and Twitter they can induce us to input our changing assessments of events, our evolving theories in real time into their ongoing calculations. Rolling out this chat AI in many applications at this point in time increases their chances of gathering and exploiting and factoring in our reaction and state of mind. Then, it would be better to become more tight-lipped. Even though that too harms us. Tricky situation.
I think you're right, AI and algorithms receive our data in and can immediately act upon what it receives. People are psychologically vulnerable to it in a couple ways. One is that people don't recognize how much their thoughts come from other places already. People take in information and feel like they've developed those thoughts on their own, but most all our thoughts and the knowledge has been learned our whole life. People need to wake up to where, and how, they're learning it from. Information that turns into peoples' deeply held beliefs can be packaged in manipulative ways, preying on people's good nature and values. Since the information people take in are connected to their own values, it's hard to discern that they shouldn't swallow the belief in its entirety. Secondly people want to be accepted and even admired, so when negativity is pointed their way thru algorithms, there are a lot of people who will buckle, or as you say just be silent. It's too much for their sense of self to be seen negatively. This was studied to manipulate people to take the transfections for example, and it's being used in climate change and systemic issues. You are right, it is a tricky situation.
Tricky indeed. The more you learn about AI particularly when thinking in terms of the military version which makes Chat GPT look like a kindergarten toy. (A toy that passed a Wharton MBA exam with a B) the more you understand how powerful it’s influence and problem solving really is.
People succumb for many reasons. At the grass roots level it is because they’ve been suckered into a tailor made paradigm fed to them that once accepted their ego will not allow them to let go. At high levels they tinker with it and us to achieve a predetermined outcome knowing consequences are nil.
I used to dismiss AI as akin to Siri or Alexa on steroids. No. It’s way more advanced than that. Musk said there are only a few gigantic AI server farms feeding very powerful computers. He said you can see their heat signature from space. It won’t be long when none of us will know what’s true.
Another “kindergarten” program that came out recently can record a mere 30 seconds of your conversation and reassemble your words with accurate tonal inflections to make you say something you never said. Or never meant to say. Undetectable.
These are just the basic toys. The power that AI wields to influence society is off the charts. We underestimate it at our peril. There’s no doubt in my mind the Pandemic was a test of its powers.
For many years now it’s been no secret our data has been captured and sold. A multibillion dollar industry.
Most of us including me had no idea why. Targeted advertising was the broad explanation.
Snowden, McAfee, and others have pointed out that intelligence gathering has been off the charts.
Again, I’d shrug it off because my life is pretty boring. I used to make a joke about how my data would put them to sleep. I mean, why the rush to gather mountains of data on average, boring law abiding citizens?
Now the answer is emerging. The more data AI is fed the more powerful it gets. AI must know every last detail about each and every one of us.
That’s how it figures out how to persuade us to give up our rights, our faith, our beliefs, fears, hopes, dreams and reshapes them in whatever paradigm is programmed by its masters.
That is why data collection has exploded. That’s why it’s so valuable. That’s why we are currently up to our eyeballs in manipulation and most still don’t see it.
AI must know you. Everything about you. Then it can calculate at the speed of light how to make you its willing puppet. You’ll never see it coming. You’ll be convinced your thoughts are your own. And, you will be wrong.
AI learns to manipulate by digesting conflict data. There isn’t a whole lot to gain from people living a peaceful existence.
For that reason I think most of the seemingly nonsensical conflicts that’ve sprung up seemingly out of nowhere from a culture of so-called “Woke” are not coincidental.
Much can be learned from pitting people against each other, and positing lunacy as fact.
Yuval Harari said, “Jesus is fake news.” “Humans are hackable animals” “AI will render most humans obsolete”
Klaus Schwab said “You will own nothing and be happy”
Listen to what they’re saying. Evidently they see Jesus/Christianity as a threat. They’re confident AI will erase your willpower and necessity for existence. And, once all is said and done whomever remains will be happy campers.
These people are rich, powerful narcissistic nihilists with many, many followers. And they’re making no secret they are coming for us.
I agree, I think a lot of the conflict is being created online. I don't think a majority of people have that same conflict in their daily lives, but they're given the perception that it's all around them.
I do feel spiritual connection, values and discernment is our way through this. I think that's part of the reason why Christianity is being directly attacked by people like Harari. The other part is they want to uproot all other sources of deeply- rooted values and beliefs, so the WEF and co. can inject their own values and beliefs.
👍🏽
Excellent! I’ve been thinking the same thing.. we’re being continuously distracted by virus/no virus, Malone good/Malone bad, CIA mind games, gender anger, etc. seems to me like we’re being sucked into the wrong wormholes. There’s a bigger plot in it all. I think you sum it up well!
Right, it's not that those discussions are not needed and valuable, but we can't get so engaged in those that we lose sight of the bigger picture happening.
I'd really love to know what you (and also JJ, if ever he were to look at it) think of this:
https://sandrews.substack.com/p/how-on-earth-did-the-world-miss-the
That really is interesting. Here’s several things that I notice.
Before talking about the mortality dip, I noticed that all countries start at zero at 2018, then they spread out from one another. I find that hard to believe, but maybe it is true, I’d have to see the source data on everyone starting at zero excess deaths.
Comparing the mortality dip with the two years before, most countries don't show a big difference. If you look at the lowest point of the mortality dip and compare that to the lowest point in the two years before, there isn't much of a difference in most countries. For most of the countries this dip looks like normal variability. Sweden looks to have the widest dip compared with the two years before, which means less people died in the first months of 2020. It's interesting that Sweden was the only country in Europe that did not have harmful authoritarian responses to the viral outbreak. Did that have something to do with it?
Since most countries didn’t have big changes in their excess deaths during the dip, even though they all dipped at the same time, I'm not sure this warrants a complex theory to explain it. I think these are all countries in europe, and they are affected by similar seasonal patterns.
It's my understanding that all countries go through seasonal changes in excess deaths. Excess mortality is higher in their winter months, and add mortality in their summer months . Lack of vitamin D production, being inside with other people, less activity, and other things might play a factor. Of course if countries have a natural disaster, or a war, there will be more excess deaths.
It's also helpful to understand what's called the pull forward effect. If a population has a spike in deaths for several years, that is usually followed by a couple years of less people dying than average. This is because the population already lost people early, that would have been dying a few years later.
When the author says covid-19 (I assume he’s talking about the coronavirus) embeds at a latent level, I think that's a possibility. I've heard Epstein-Barr does that. I don't agree that our immune systems are naive though. There are trillions of cells in our body interacting with trillions of genetic material in our environment with every breath we take, and with everything we touch. This is a constant and evolving relationship. Even when we get sick it doesn’t mean that our immune cells are naïve to a pathogen. There are often other stresses in the body and environment that increase symptoms of illness, but doesn't mean that we haven't seen the pathogen, or a part of the pathogen, before. If we travel to a different country, then our immune systems will be naive to what people have evolved to handle already in that country.
The author makes some bulleted points as a part of the theory. I don't think the second point is necessarily true, and other points after that are related to it being true. That is RNA cleaving enables it to enter cells more easily. He gives a source for this statement that is more about the effect of UV light, and the sources in vitro, which is so much different than what happens in the whole system of trillions of cells coordinating every second of every day in our body. Also, not all genetic material enters are cells. Sometimes our killer cells are macrophages encounter it and just break it down.
So those are my main impressions. How does that land with you? Do other things stand out for you?
Brilliant explanation. I have been trying to wrap my head around this for a long while. It adds value to my theory and does not disprove any of it - I think.
I speculate that various bugs were doing the rounds as they do all the time. Then along comes 5G and amplifies absolutely every sickness ever known to man. Some of these diseases develop quickly and some slowly. For example, it amplified colds and flus in the early days so that they turned into pneumonia and became deadly. It quickly wiped out those who could not tolerate the 5G frequencies - mostly old people whose "dirty electricity" tolerance is lower.
But then the diseases that develop more slowly followed. There has been a massive upsurge in diseases like diabetes, the rest of metabolic syndrome, heart issues, blood clots, various cancers and other viral issues like shingles, which disable and kill more slowly. All of these diseases are vulnerable to disturbance of the body's electrical control and communication systems which is what 5G plays havoc with. This is long covid, which to my mind has nothing whatever to do with the residual effects of any cold or flu and everything to do with long term damage being done to the body wholesale by 5G.
The timing for this is perfect. At the same time that the supposed pandemic occurred, 5G was rolled out and switched on around the world. While the world was locked down, there were teams with free passes installing 5G everywhere. The first places it was switched on had the worst initial hospitalisation numbers, but these hospitalizations and deaths have not let up. My theory, that 5G makes every weakness we already have much much worse, could account for the phenomenal variety of symptoms experienced by those who go down with apparently wild covid and those for whom illness lingers on with long covid.
So where do the injections come into this? Well, not everyone is electro-sensitive. My personal theory is that those with high levels of mercury, lead, aluminium etc are electro-sensitives and are easily affected by dirty electricity et al. So what do the injections do? Introduce electrical conductors of various kinds to ensure that bodies that were previously not vulnerable to "death by 5G" become vulnerable.
Too many tangents for most to be able to hold in their heads simultaneously and see the bigger picture - the interplay between a cold or flu and every other disease known to man, with 5G that affects electro-sensitives, and jabs to make more people electro-sensitive. Can you draw this one?
Wonderful, I'm so glad it was helpful. Explaining step by step with pictures seems to really help understanding.
Right now I'm in the middle of a big stack on the Alison McDowell's research. It turned out to be a much bigger project than I anticipated. I'm headed into the third phase of this stack, which is about synthetic biology and transhumanism. I think 5G will make it into a couple slides, and I'm creating an accompanying video with one clip showing the human created electromagnetic field we exist in now.
5G may indeed interact with the shots. People have found a lot of metals in them, as well as evidence for nanotubes and quantum dots. I've been electromagnetic sensitive, and it got a little better with a heavy metal cleanse, so I think you're right, it has to do with how many metals are built up in the body.
There have been many studies showing the ill effects of 5G. I also noticed that Wuhan, New York and that city in Italy all had already rolled out 5G (and Wuhan had an incredible amount of pollution). Like you say, there are several avenues for 5G to affect people. Even if they don't feel it, it's moving through their body, and so much of our body functions through ion exchange and mini electrical currents. I don't see how it doesn't affect people's baseline health, worsen any pre-existing condition, weakens the body to fight off new conditions, and it possibly will interact with synthetic biology. So I think you're right. But for people who don't feel it, it's really tough to get them to recognize the possibilities.
Oh dear, I am now realising the limitations of Substack. Of recent times I have been simply going through my Substack inbox to see the state of play around the world, and I confess, I had not come across Alison McDowell. So thankyou for the introduction. I will have to pay more attention to cross posting articles about or by people not yet on Substack.
I have told so many people about the 5G blanket rollout to selected cities including Wuhan, Lombardy and some unknown city in South America co-inciding with the apparent outbreak of covid. Few are listening though.
Yes, the whole 5G was pushed on the world in a similar way the injections were, which is a big red flag. I live in California. A city council in San Diego tried to refuse 5G, but I think the federal gov overruled them - it can't be refused. There's no reason for that, most people don't need 5G speeds, so it's another troubling sign of totalitarianism. Along with cameras on every major corner, total surveillance. Since most people can't feel 5G, and it doesn't immediately affect their health, it's really hard for people to get concerned.
I think Allison's research is one of the most important, but it's really hard to enter into her videos and writing without some simplifying explanations and framing. There are so many details she keeps in her head and didn't explain fully each time she says them.