Thank you! Understanding the biology is vital. I think JJ has nailed it so far. It's been interesting to follow his journey since I discovered him last summer.
Your PDF is very smart. It's easier to understand than JJ's. Did you use Word or something similar? If so, would you consider sending me the file so I can translate it into the Norwegian and German language? PDFs are cumbersome to work with, but I will manage if that's what you did.
Hi TJ - I think it would be great to translate. I turned it into a form where you can access every text box to change the language. I will email you tomorrow. 💕
Thanks for introducing me to JJ Couey's theory on how the COVID virus was spread. I listened to his presentation on the topic. It's very interesting that the procedure for producing quantities of mRNA viral clones could the main culprit for increasing infectivity, and severity of disease, rather than the "gain of function" redesign of viral genomes. (I question whether the dim-bulbs involved in overseeing the research could have purposefully redesigned the viruses for any reason, so the Couey theory is attractive. )
I think perhaps they could purposefully redesign them (it seems there are a few unnatural inserts). But the dim bulbs could not redesign them to kill a large number of the world's people. It might be engaging for them to think it's possible, and think they are helping fight or win at bioterrorism with their research. But the complex biological systems of our body and the natural world will keep throwing cold water on any fantasies they might have. 😊
Early on, Luc Montagnier commented that the sequences he saw as attributed to the SARS CoV-2 virus did not appear to be naturally occurring. Lesser scientists and the media dragged his name through the mud. Shortly after I left infectious diseases research, 1989 or so, I had learned that the HIV virus, (which he discovered), was known to have mutated within the same patient. That instability of retroviruses was knowable sooooooo long ago. I'm definitely with you in taking comfort that nature is much more resilient to hacking by nutjobs, and that it is amazingly self maintaining and repairing.
IS HE RIGHT? Coronaviruses can't cause a pandemic??
From where I sit it looks entirely reasonable based on his explanation, but I'm not a biologist, I'm just a lowly systems analyst. I'm used to spotting patterns in complex systems and I've spent the last three years trying to absorb as much as I can. I'd like to hear from others who are more knowledgeable about this stuff.
BTW I don't need to hear from the "no-virus" crowd. I know what you think and I'm neither on-board with it nor am I rejecting it. That's a different discussion.
Also I've become convinced that there never was any real "pandemic", for one simple reason: TPTB all over Western nations (with a FEW exceptions) all deviated from the existing pandemic response plans that they'd had in place for two decades or more. I can't see them doing that if it was a real pandemic. The reason they dared to do so this time is they knew what it actually was (or wasn't).
You make a good point about the powers that be daviating from protocols. If it was a real pandemic this would not have been done easily.
It is very easy to find in a search that RNA polymerase - used to replicate any RNA virus - makes an error every 1,000 or so base pairs. So by that fact alone, there's no way an RNA virus can cause a worldwide pandemic. It just can't replicate itself accurately enough from person to person.
I don't imagine we can have a worldwide pandemic of any biological substance because it would have to come from what is already here, and we've got 9 billion immune systems that have evolved with what is already here. Yes they could tinker with biological substances (bacteria, viruses) already here, but it would be coming from something that many immune systems have already recognized. The one uncertainty is how many immune systems have been damaged by the transfection; there may be hundreds of millions of people who wouldn't be able to fight off infections that they normally could before taking the transfection.
Ok but then how are we to understand the 1918 influenza? It was ostensibly an RNA virus that infected about 1/3 of the planet's pop and precipitated the real killer, which was bacterial pneumonia.
Even with the many bad copies that RNA generates there would have to be sufficient 'good' copies made such that transmission to another host could occur. I mean we're talking about really really big numbers...
Are we talking about big numbers though??? The 1918 flu killed a total of 675,000 people in the US over two years, so over two flu seasons. But even if we take all those deaths just in one flu season, it killed only 0.6% of the US population. (675,000 / 103 million people). But really it probably killed 0.4% one year, and 0.2% the next. So that's in the range of a bad flu year, and a vast majority of people - 99.4% - were protected by their natural immune systems. Media takes these historical references out of context as part of the fear mongering over disease.
The 1918 flu supposedly killed 25 million world wide (although the numbers can easily be inflated with all the things people already are dying of). But if we take that at face value, that was only 1.3% of the world's population. Again, 98.7% of the time people were protected by their natural immune systems.
In addition to what Cathie says below, I also read that doctors were over-dosing their patients on the new drug aspirin. So just like the past 3 years, mismanagement probably contributed to deaths as well.
Here’s a good summary of roseneau’s experiment. The original can be found online but I don’t have time now. If you want I’ll find it and send the original. Here for now is this summary
The “Spanish flu of 1918” was never proven to be caused by an “infectious agent” of any kind. Milton Rosemead’s experiments were brought to my attention, so I did what I usually do…I read his paper! To summarize, he could not demonstrate “transmission” or “contagion” no matter how ridiculous the method of inoculation was. I’ll post a link to his study at top in case anyone else wants to read it.
I think it’s telling that many equate today’s manufactured event with a supposedly zoonotic pandemic that’s 105 years old, the facts having become so far back in the rear view mirror as to have become but an anecdotal speck. Worse, we talk as if the next one is right around the corner. Nothing makes any contextual sense.
Lanka measles paper is good but somehow I attached that link instead of this, which I meant to offer. I’ll also repost at top in case anyone else is interested in Lanka’s laboratory research. Thanks for your interest
Here’s Stefan, author of the papers I shared, in conversation with Tom. I also highly recommend reading Mark Baileys research paper. And also their video response to Jj’s recorded statements. All three links here:
Without first isolating / purifying, accurate characterization is impossible. As there is no scientific evidence proving the particle in question is indeed a “virus” it’s just time wasted to go to such great lengths to discuss an unproven hypothesis. It’s imperative to read the studies yourself. Jj can say all he wants about all the “coronaviruses” he believes exist…but where is the science? That’s all that needs to be shown to us “no virus” people. It’s all we’re asking for: show us the science. So far, all the science shown to us is proving that viruses don’t exist. It’s always been that way: one study upon the next, all referencing studies that failed to prove “virus” hypothesis correct. The repeated failures do indicate that “coronaviruses” are not existing in the way virologists define and assert they are. Isolation is just one of the scientific imperatives for proving existence. After 130+ years of the unproven hypothesis, why have we all not accepted the scientific results?
I think you're absolutely right, "viruses" have not been proven to exist. When something is not isolated, we can't know it's properties are the effect it's having in the body. The fact that our bodies have trillions of cells coordinating together every moment of the day shows that it's all but impossible to know the effect of a single genetic strand. It's all happening within a big beautiful complex system.
I watched the full video of the response to JJ Couey's criticisms, and I'll watch the others you've linked to in the next day or two. I wish he would have come to that discussion so they coukd hash it out. Like I had said, JJ knows that there's not scientific proof, so he won't provide a paper that proves viruses exist.
JJ points to tangential proof of infectious agents. And here is where messaging is important. I think I'll write a substack on that and see if we can make some headway thinking this through.
To me, the statement "viruses don't exist because they haven't been isolated and here's the undeniable proof" will not reach 90% of the Western population. There are multiple reasons for that, and I want to flush those out in a substack. The population needs a bridge in their conceptualizing this truth. And it's an uphill battle for several reasons, particularly the way people make sense of the world and form concepts based on that.
In the meantime, there is some usefulness in talking about infectious agents as "viruses" to meet the population where they are at, so they can learn a worldwide pandemic is not possible. Simply stating "viruses don't exist" is not enough to help people shift to where they won't be drawn in again by the next declared "pandemic". The people who believe there was a coronavirus worldwide outbreak will be able to digest JJ's perspective way more than the virus has never proven to exist perspective.
But this community needs to keep pointing it out. I didn't watch the whole segment, but del big tree had someone on the highwire who uses genetic sequencing. In the clip I saw, she was trying to convince Dell that you don't need to isolate the virus and see what it does, genetic sequencing is enough. That is so not true, and that is the big trap they are trying to guide the world's population to.
Thanks for the back and forth, I think this is so important.
Thank you so much for your thoughtful responses, and I do agree I think entirely with what you say here. But this concept of “tangential proof” is troubling to me…. but without knowing what JJ has said specifically, I can only criticize what I think that means. I assume he means that “tangential proof” is like epidemiological observations, which should certainly generate hypotheses to be tested and proven under the most rigorous scientific studies. What ever happened to the high ethical standard in science where researchers spend more effort to disprove their own (and others’) hypotheses?
I’m curious to understand what JJ means by tangential proof, so please summarize or post link to him explaining that so I can be sure I understand. Thank you so much.
I don't know what he means by tangential proof. I think I saw that in the video you linked to - the Bailey's and Cohen got together to comment on a couple of JJ's video clips. At some point JJ held up some bound papers saying something about the other types of proof pointing in the direction of an infectious agent. I wish he would sit down with them and hash it out, but it would be easier for him if it is one-on-one or one on two so he isn't so outnumbered, and maybe that would relax any dissonance that might be a rising in him. Or maybe sometime JJ could make a video presentation on the tangential proof.
This is an interesting read, but if you want to go straight to the summary of rosenau’s experiment, scroll to bottom and then go up to the epidemiological section. That’s where they chose to bury Milton rosenaus important (non)findings on contagion of what was supposed to be the most contagious disease in modern history. The summary is toward the end of the 2nd to last “chapter” of this report. You will find it if you look.
Wow, that's a great article. I'd heard of that experiment.
After reading the whole article on trying to culture bacteria in those infected and not having evidence that a vaccine works... it makes me see absolutely nothing has changed in Western germ theory thought re respiratory illness! At least nothing is changing in the narrative about respiratory illness.
As I understand it, the over-prescribing of aspirin during the "terrible Spanish flu pandemic that killed less than 1% of the US population" contributed to people's deaths as well.
And since JC’s opinion/interpretation of the dogma (aka, “the science”) is the topic, here’s an update from Christine Massey (thanks Christine). Clearly JC is wrestling with his own cognitive dissonance!
Thanks for Christine's post. I think she's right, JJ is straddling the line between virus and no virus. He talked with someone else in a video about it, and referenced tangential evidence of viruses to support his use of the term virus. But he got a little heated, so I think he is struggling with the dissonance.
What if we used these three terms interchangeably - virus, infectious agent, genetic material.
This is the nuanced line being straddled. Let's exchange the word "virus" for "infectious agent" - meaning that something can be passed from one person to another, making them ill (whether it be a toxic substance or biological material). An example that people experience is the chickenpox. Can you explain the chicken pox, and how easily it spreads from child to child, without the concept of an infectious agent? I'm not sure terrain theory can explain this, since in my understanding people in different in terrains around the world get chicken pox. What do you think?
People around the world also repeatedly experience being around others who are sick without getting sick themselves. When people don't get sick from someone else's "infectious agent" they chalk it up to their immune system or not being exposed enough, not to the understanding that the person could just be detoxing and can't spread anything to another person.
In the west germ theory is stuck in people's minds so solidly that it's hard for them to even consider a conversation that leads with "viruses don't exist". So they need a bridge into this conversation. In my third substack I attempted to bridge was use the term "genetic material" in exchange for "virus and infectious agent." (I pointed out that it's really genetic material being measured, not viruses being isolated). It's genetic material that the PCR test is picking up on, and JJ Couey is calling that "virus". See if you think my third sub stack is a good bridge between the no virus people and the "infectious agent" people (infectious agent people are people who know viruses have not been proven to exist but think there are occasional infectious agents that can spread from person to person).
Oh I wanted to also comment on chicken pox, which is something I have thought about too. I honestly do not know why chicken pox happens and appears to affect kids in clusters ie it looks to be “infectious”. The most important thing we can do if we want to understand it from a scientific approach is scientific experimentation. To my knowledge, there is no scientific evidence that chicken pox is caused by “virus” which is what we are told. So again, holding the virologists who gave us the “virus” explanation for chicken pox, we need to see the scientific methods they have used to prove that a “virus” is the “infectious agent” responsible for “transmission” of this disease. To my knowledge, there are not scientific experiments or studies that we can look at and then say, oh yes, there’s the scientific proof that chicken pox is a transmissible disease caused by virus, AND we can see that proper controls were also conducted to rule out possible causes other than the independent variable in question.
So I remain very interested in the true cause of chicken pox, but there’s no reason for me or anyone to conclude it’s a “virus” until the scientific method proves that. Why should any scientist accept an explanation not supported by valid scientific methods?
Sam bailey has a pretty good video dedicated to chicken pox which I’ll link in a moment.
It's fascinating to consider... Like does the human species - human body have something we are physically born with that needs to detox or express at some point of our lives. Like some anomaly that happens to be in the human physical population these past 100 to 200 years... It doesn't even have to necessarily be a biological agent...
Thank you for your thoughtful response and questions for my consideration. I have not read your Substack link you posted but I will do so and then I’ll respond with my thoughts on that. I understand what you are saying, and I appreciate you are trying to bring the “sides” closer together so we can either agree or just continue the conversation/debate on “virus”. I have wondered about interchanging the word “virus” for the word “devil” so that people can see how ridiculous it is to assert the “devil” is the cause of illness. We can go to the scientific papers written and read them as “‘the devil’ isolated in the first us Covid patient” and then see how they isolated the devil in the methods section. It’s really that ridiculous because everyone would say, “how do you know that particle in the EM is “the devil?” And no one would respond, “because we know the disease is caused by “the devil” and we know that ‘the devil’ is present when we observe CPE in vitro…and our in silico sequencing tells us the genetic sequence’ of ‘the devil’ which we then confirmed is in fact ‘the devil’ via PCR, which used primers derived of pure ‘devil’ isolates!” And we would say, can you show us how you got those pure “isolates”? And the devologists would say, “we isolated the devil and that’s where the isolates come from.” Or they would say, “oh my, those devil isolates are so dangerous that only the cdc is allowed to have them in top secret safety laboratories…but they gave us the sequence from which we derived partial sequences of the whole devil genome…” This is the nonsense we have listened to when we have asked questions about “virus” isolation, and yet, if we replace “devil” for “virus” everyone agrees it’s absolutely absurd circular reasoning nonsense anti science.
What really is interesting is the dogma is so powerful that even my close and intelligent friends who trust me will understand and agree that virus hasn’t been proven…But then they say, we’ll if you cannot tell me what caused the illness, then it must be “virus”! And I say, “why do we make the unproven hypothesis the default explanation when we cannot provide a “better” answer to an interesting and important question: what caused disease?
I have said this to some friends:
If your lamp goes out and you declare the electrical grid is down, I can easily demonstrate that your declaration is incorrect by flipping on another lamp in the house. (The grid is not down). Then if you say, well, you have not told me why the lamp went out, therefore the grid is down because you haven’t provided a better explanation. Everyone would agree that “the grid is down” is the hypothesis proven wrong, AND importantly, without the need for a lamp specialist to give us the precise explanation. No, we simply say, well it cannot possibly be the electrical grid. Amazingly, it’s not that logical for people when it comes to viruses and devils because the dogma is powerful.
We need to hold virologists to their own definition of “virus”. If we start playing around with definition exchange and modification, then we end up more trouble like selling “gene therapy” as “vaccine.”
But I get your point and I do appreciate what you are trying to do, which I think is bring people together. Thank you for this, and please continue.
I think the viral cause of disease hangs on so concretely in people's minds because of how we experience cause and effect in their lives. I turn the key, the car starts, I turn on the faucet, the water runs, I flip the switch, light appears from the lamp (unless the grid is out). This very simple cause and effect that is such a fundamental and infinitely repeated part of our physical lives powerfully lends itself to subconsciously believing - I breathe in a germ and I get sick.
Reposting a link I intended to share earlier. Anyone interested in Stefan Lanka’s laboratory research results will want to read and understand the implications:
I’ve been following Couey for a while and find him to be the brightest light in the darkness we’ve been in the last three years. I hope he gains traction. He needs more exposure. It’d be nice if Joe Rogan would feature him on his podcast.
I feel the same way. More and more people know about him, Tessa just posted a great conversation with him. Being on Joe Rogan would be optimal for sure! 😄. Joe tends to be interested in scientists, and I'm not sure he's had a biologist on. He actually might be interested.
A PhD biologist like Couey is a scientist. In fact he is exactly the right kind of scientist necessary to unravel everything going on.
Not to take away from others who’ve been in the limelight but I see it akin to craftsperson’s. A plumber might very well be able to wire a light switch but all things considered I’d rather have an electrician.
The biggest problem with covid pushback, particularly in the arena of big pharma vaccines has been the fragmentation of dissidents into camps.
You’ve got the “viruses don’t exist” camp vs a legion of doctors, scientists, veterinarians, professors, and laypeople. Many positing themselves as dissidents but coming at it from wildly disparate angles.
This is utterly SELF DEFEATING.
Evil is laughing at our lack of cohesion. The more time I spend on Substack the more depressed I get.
Until the majority draw a line in the sand and say en-masse “Yeah, Jonathan Couey makes perfect sense, I stand behind him” this war will simply continue to reflect an attitude of,
“My PhDs vs your PhDs.”
While this might be good for certain mouthpieces who gain audiences based on the flavor they present. As an effective strategy against the evil in the world it goes absolutely nowhere.
Everyone needs to stand behind the same line in the sand. Otherwise the destabilizing forces that are ruining our lives will win.
Thanks for this comment. I agree that JJ Couey is a real scientist, in the real sense of what that means. Since biology is the fundamental aspect of what has happened, it's the fundamental understanding needed.
I think the things that orients all "dissidents" is the fact that we generally agree about what is happening - the word pandemic doesn't apply to what happened the last 3 years, so there is no need for a vaccine/transfection. The vaccine transfection is a new type of drug and has adverse effects. Most all of us dissidents went through some kind of stress and difficulty (or even went through hell) in choosing not to be injected. Other dissidents who did take the jab also have gone through stress, realizing they've been misled and maybe even injured. To me these basic facts connect us all to a solid rock together. When/if the shit hits the fan, now I know exactly who I want, and who I have, in my trenches. When I'm down and out and there are different organizations and people pointing a finger at me, you are there too, and I stand with you. I will not leave these fundamental principles that have defined us; standing for these principles feels defining.
From there, people have different perspectives on this and that, which I think is natural.
Meeting a like-minded community of eight people who live near me has really helped. I didn't know them before, and I feel so bonded to them now. Do you have a like-minded community around you?
My friends whom all prior to covid pretended they were gun toting constitution hugging, freedom loving, non-believers in fake news, big patriots, right? ALL folded like a cheap deck of cards and drank the covid Kool-Aid.
Not all of them HAD to take the jab but did anyway. Fortunately for myself, wife and child, all remain skeptical and unjabbed. My in-laws, sister and brother in law, their kids, and virtually all of my neighbors are sold on the pandemic fakery. They all think we’re insane.
My brothers aren’t jabbed or my neice’s. But I don’t see much of them. I’m retired but I’d say virtually all of my wife’s coworkers are bought-in. All our neighbors too.
So yeah, we are basically an island. I’ve never been so disappointed in people in my life. Due to my stance I’ve lost one friend I’ve known 25 years and the rest of my relationships aren’t the same. And I live in Ohio! Not a coastal blue state.
While I agree you are 100% correct in identifying the core drivers of people’s dissent I stand by my assertion that until there’s cohesiveness in the direction the majority take in pushing back on this madness it wont be effective.
Most of the Malone’s, Geert VB’s, Sirotkin’s, Yeadon’s, and a whole lot more appeal to the emotional side of the argument but when you distill it down none are saying what needs to be said.
The only people that fall readily to mind that are at the forefront of calling to expose the bad actors, dissect the scam, and end the injections are JFK Jr and Jonathan Couey.
Rand Paul squawks as do many others in lawmaking and scientific positions but they’re mostly ignoring VAERS, ignoring sudden deaths, ignoring all cause mortality stats, ignoring insurance stats, ignoring damning FOIA documentation.
Even Trump whom people worship like he’s their savior refuses to address anything important. On the contrary he green lighted this mess, pushed the vaccines through, and says they saved lives. Are you kidding me? Trump is untrustworthy I’m my view but fat chance you’ll get anyone on the Right to see it.
Meanwhile, Fauci recently went on record recently predicting another pandemic will hit “maybe as soon as next year.” I believe him because the smug little elf predicted the one in 2020 too. My feeling is, he’s not clairvoyant. He’s just instrumental in deliberately poisoning us.
Couey is smelling a rat. A deliberate release of dna clones in strategic locations with a media blitz and PCR tests run at a bazillion cycles to keep a manufactured plandemic going. Motivation is money and power at our expense. It makes 100% perfect sense. Seriously, it’s a crystal clear revelation that should be gaining traction everywhere.
We need to find out who these people are. How they did it. And stop them before they do it again. And they will. Because it worked. The largest wealth transfer in history. The largest single erasure of rights. The largest willingness for a nation to fall to its knees this side of winning a hot war. Why wouldn’t they do it again?
Under the circumstances there ought to be 1,000s of fired up experts seeing what’s at stake like Couey does and saying holy shit! We are in big trouble. Instead we’ve got the broken records spewing the same old useless songs over and over. Dissident warriors stick with their favorite crooners and dance to nowhere.
Yeah, I agree with how all these people acted to herd the majority into following harmful interventions and even injecting themselves with an untested pharmaceutical product. It was so disappointing for me too, to see every single friend and loved one fall for this fear mongering narrative. I just wrote another post on the basic facts that even fear-mongering narrative lovers have to agree with. I've been telling my friends these things to hopefully make a dent in time for the next supposed pandemic.
> My BS degree in Biology, minor in chemistry and 20+ year PT career in health care didn’t save me from feeling punch drunk by the complex informational landscape during the first two years of the covid viral outbreak.
Reply: You have diagnosed your problem. You don't get out in nature enough. You are recycling the "vesicles, exosomes, virions" etc. of the medical environment you are in. You need to spend much more time with your hands in an organic, regenerative garden. You need to find woods and creeks where you can drink the water. If you can find such a place (quite common when I was a child) you have found a place that will inform you. I am sure in doing what is mentioned here your view will be expanded and informed spiritually at least.
> My BS degree in Biology, minor in chemistry and 20+ year PT career in health care didn’t save me from feeling punch drunk by the complex informational landscape during the first two years of the covid viral outbreak.
I am not here to troll, I found your sustack watching Jay Couey, whose theory I fully embrace. I was just responding to the comment I copied. In it there is no indication of life style that is true. But if that is an indication, then that narrows the ability of nature to inform you.
I skipped the transfections. Why? No a mention of our immune system was a huge red light. I live and work in nature all my life and have a reverence for all of life. Also having read James Lovelock scientist (deceased) and his collaborator Lynn Margulis PhD (deceased) books for many years to gain understanding, I learned Gaia was/is the major reason for life on Earth. The bacteria have a 4 billion year history, humans just got started and all we can do at best is enslave life. No where at no time has a human created life. Yet we are a result of 4 billion years of Gaia. If that means I am a troll, what can I say.
I never considered taking the transfection - so I didn't mean that I was confused or undecided about that part. When I said I was punch-drunk on the information, I was alluding to all the threads of info being put out there about the viral outbreak and transfections. I'm in California and my whole community believed the narrative and took the injections. There were a lot of things we were talking about, and we were discerning how we were understanding different things.
I live in a fairly rural area on a family farm, and have always been in sync with the natural world.
I live in California too in the central sierra foothills. What I have sensed or projected is that the theory of Gaia has been buried in Earth System Science. Most people today don't know anything about the Gaia Theory. Those that do, know it on the level of an AI reply. That was my first encounter with AI and that was enough.
I have heard of the idea of "thought stopper". The AI reply on Gaia was the perfect thought stopper. AI did the search so that must be all there is. But having spent years reading and re-reading the books by James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis and others I knew a great deal more an realized that AI will only give consensuses reality answers.
Gaia theory is another way of looking at the immune system. Lynn Margulis PhD said humans should not wage war on the biome (biome is Gaia in this case). Doing so would only lead to our own destruction. Today people in power have thrown her wisdom to the winds and have declared war on the biome.
My speculation projected that you know little of Gaia and thus little of the biome in your gut. Knowing about Gaia theory deeply allows us to see all of life as if not our friend, at least not our enemy. I suspect that Jay doesn't know much about Gaia, but what he does know teaches us to respect not fear nature. He stimulates us to respect and give thanks for our immune system and life.
Thank you for your patience with me. It was never my intent to troll you. I don't really know what a troll is. BE WELL.
Hope you guys like my substack post on JJCouey https://open.substack.com/pub/tjacobsen/p/zoonosis-or-lab-leak?utm_source=direct&r=p0tzp&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Thank you very much for compiling this critical information from Dr. JJ Couey.
You're welcome. :)
Thank you! Understanding the biology is vital. I think JJ has nailed it so far. It's been interesting to follow his journey since I discovered him last summer.
I agree whole heartedly.
Your PDF is very smart. It's easier to understand than JJ's. Did you use Word or something similar? If so, would you consider sending me the file so I can translate it into the Norwegian and German language? PDFs are cumbersome to work with, but I will manage if that's what you did.
Hi TJ - I think it would be great to translate. I turned it into a form where you can access every text box to change the language. I will email you tomorrow. 💕
Great! Thanks a lot! I will of course send it back to you when I have translated it.
Ok, I just sent them from my kdphysicaltherapy email.
Thanks!
Thanks for introducing me to JJ Couey's theory on how the COVID virus was spread. I listened to his presentation on the topic. It's very interesting that the procedure for producing quantities of mRNA viral clones could the main culprit for increasing infectivity, and severity of disease, rather than the "gain of function" redesign of viral genomes. (I question whether the dim-bulbs involved in overseeing the research could have purposefully redesigned the viruses for any reason, so the Couey theory is attractive. )
You're welcome.
I think perhaps they could purposefully redesign them (it seems there are a few unnatural inserts). But the dim bulbs could not redesign them to kill a large number of the world's people. It might be engaging for them to think it's possible, and think they are helping fight or win at bioterrorism with their research. But the complex biological systems of our body and the natural world will keep throwing cold water on any fantasies they might have. 😊
Early on, Luc Montagnier commented that the sequences he saw as attributed to the SARS CoV-2 virus did not appear to be naturally occurring. Lesser scientists and the media dragged his name through the mud. Shortly after I left infectious diseases research, 1989 or so, I had learned that the HIV virus, (which he discovered), was known to have mutated within the same patient. That instability of retroviruses was knowable sooooooo long ago. I'm definitely with you in taking comfort that nature is much more resilient to hacking by nutjobs, and that it is amazingly self maintaining and repairing.
I only have one question that's perplexing me:
IS HE RIGHT? Coronaviruses can't cause a pandemic??
From where I sit it looks entirely reasonable based on his explanation, but I'm not a biologist, I'm just a lowly systems analyst. I'm used to spotting patterns in complex systems and I've spent the last three years trying to absorb as much as I can. I'd like to hear from others who are more knowledgeable about this stuff.
BTW I don't need to hear from the "no-virus" crowd. I know what you think and I'm neither on-board with it nor am I rejecting it. That's a different discussion.
Also I've become convinced that there never was any real "pandemic", for one simple reason: TPTB all over Western nations (with a FEW exceptions) all deviated from the existing pandemic response plans that they'd had in place for two decades or more. I can't see them doing that if it was a real pandemic. The reason they dared to do so this time is they knew what it actually was (or wasn't).
You make a good point about the powers that be daviating from protocols. If it was a real pandemic this would not have been done easily.
It is very easy to find in a search that RNA polymerase - used to replicate any RNA virus - makes an error every 1,000 or so base pairs. So by that fact alone, there's no way an RNA virus can cause a worldwide pandemic. It just can't replicate itself accurately enough from person to person.
I don't imagine we can have a worldwide pandemic of any biological substance because it would have to come from what is already here, and we've got 9 billion immune systems that have evolved with what is already here. Yes they could tinker with biological substances (bacteria, viruses) already here, but it would be coming from something that many immune systems have already recognized. The one uncertainty is how many immune systems have been damaged by the transfection; there may be hundreds of millions of people who wouldn't be able to fight off infections that they normally could before taking the transfection.
Ok but then how are we to understand the 1918 influenza? It was ostensibly an RNA virus that infected about 1/3 of the planet's pop and precipitated the real killer, which was bacterial pneumonia.
Even with the many bad copies that RNA generates there would have to be sufficient 'good' copies made such that transmission to another host could occur. I mean we're talking about really really big numbers...
Are we talking about big numbers though??? The 1918 flu killed a total of 675,000 people in the US over two years, so over two flu seasons. But even if we take all those deaths just in one flu season, it killed only 0.6% of the US population. (675,000 / 103 million people). But really it probably killed 0.4% one year, and 0.2% the next. So that's in the range of a bad flu year, and a vast majority of people - 99.4% - were protected by their natural immune systems. Media takes these historical references out of context as part of the fear mongering over disease.
The 1918 flu supposedly killed 25 million world wide (although the numbers can easily be inflated with all the things people already are dying of). But if we take that at face value, that was only 1.3% of the world's population. Again, 98.7% of the time people were protected by their natural immune systems.
In addition to what Cathie says below, I also read that doctors were over-dosing their patients on the new drug aspirin. So just like the past 3 years, mismanagement probably contributed to deaths as well.
Here’s a good summary of roseneau’s experiment. The original can be found online but I don’t have time now. If you want I’ll find it and send the original. Here for now is this summary
https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html
The “Spanish flu of 1918” was never proven to be caused by an “infectious agent” of any kind. Milton Rosemead’s experiments were brought to my attention, so I did what I usually do…I read his paper! To summarize, he could not demonstrate “transmission” or “contagion” no matter how ridiculous the method of inoculation was. I’ll post a link to his study at top in case anyone else wants to read it.
Right, wow - it was very interesting to read about. Thanks for linking to that paper.
*roseneau
I think it’s telling that many equate today’s manufactured event with a supposedly zoonotic pandemic that’s 105 years old, the facts having become so far back in the rear view mirror as to have become but an anecdotal speck. Worse, we talk as if the next one is right around the corner. Nothing makes any contextual sense.
If you’re willing to invest the time I think watching this might clear things up for you. https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1782037505
Thanks for sharing!
Thank you for making a difference and simplicity is beautiful.
Lovely, thanks Suzi.
Downloaded the slide set, thank you!
Lanka measles paper is good but somehow I attached that link instead of this, which I meant to offer. I’ll also repost at top in case anyone else is interested in Lanka’s laboratory research. Thanks for your interest
https://brandfolder.com/s/7z5mpjg6nq8xn773pt8nkrbb
Here’s Stefan, author of the papers I shared, in conversation with Tom. I also highly recommend reading Mark Baileys research paper. And also their video response to Jj’s recorded statements. All three links here:
https://fos-sa.org/2021/03/29/dr-stefan-lanka-dr-thomas-cowans-discussion-about-virology/
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZAez87CuD6Ec/
Thanks, I watched the response to JJ Couey video, and I'll watch the others in the next day or two. 👍🏽
Without first isolating / purifying, accurate characterization is impossible. As there is no scientific evidence proving the particle in question is indeed a “virus” it’s just time wasted to go to such great lengths to discuss an unproven hypothesis. It’s imperative to read the studies yourself. Jj can say all he wants about all the “coronaviruses” he believes exist…but where is the science? That’s all that needs to be shown to us “no virus” people. It’s all we’re asking for: show us the science. So far, all the science shown to us is proving that viruses don’t exist. It’s always been that way: one study upon the next, all referencing studies that failed to prove “virus” hypothesis correct. The repeated failures do indicate that “coronaviruses” are not existing in the way virologists define and assert they are. Isolation is just one of the scientific imperatives for proving existence. After 130+ years of the unproven hypothesis, why have we all not accepted the scientific results?
I think you're absolutely right, "viruses" have not been proven to exist. When something is not isolated, we can't know it's properties are the effect it's having in the body. The fact that our bodies have trillions of cells coordinating together every moment of the day shows that it's all but impossible to know the effect of a single genetic strand. It's all happening within a big beautiful complex system.
I watched the full video of the response to JJ Couey's criticisms, and I'll watch the others you've linked to in the next day or two. I wish he would have come to that discussion so they coukd hash it out. Like I had said, JJ knows that there's not scientific proof, so he won't provide a paper that proves viruses exist.
JJ points to tangential proof of infectious agents. And here is where messaging is important. I think I'll write a substack on that and see if we can make some headway thinking this through.
To me, the statement "viruses don't exist because they haven't been isolated and here's the undeniable proof" will not reach 90% of the Western population. There are multiple reasons for that, and I want to flush those out in a substack. The population needs a bridge in their conceptualizing this truth. And it's an uphill battle for several reasons, particularly the way people make sense of the world and form concepts based on that.
In the meantime, there is some usefulness in talking about infectious agents as "viruses" to meet the population where they are at, so they can learn a worldwide pandemic is not possible. Simply stating "viruses don't exist" is not enough to help people shift to where they won't be drawn in again by the next declared "pandemic". The people who believe there was a coronavirus worldwide outbreak will be able to digest JJ's perspective way more than the virus has never proven to exist perspective.
But this community needs to keep pointing it out. I didn't watch the whole segment, but del big tree had someone on the highwire who uses genetic sequencing. In the clip I saw, she was trying to convince Dell that you don't need to isolate the virus and see what it does, genetic sequencing is enough. That is so not true, and that is the big trap they are trying to guide the world's population to.
Thanks for the back and forth, I think this is so important.
Thank you so much for your thoughtful responses, and I do agree I think entirely with what you say here. But this concept of “tangential proof” is troubling to me…. but without knowing what JJ has said specifically, I can only criticize what I think that means. I assume he means that “tangential proof” is like epidemiological observations, which should certainly generate hypotheses to be tested and proven under the most rigorous scientific studies. What ever happened to the high ethical standard in science where researchers spend more effort to disprove their own (and others’) hypotheses?
I’m curious to understand what JJ means by tangential proof, so please summarize or post link to him explaining that so I can be sure I understand. Thank you so much.
I don't know what he means by tangential proof. I think I saw that in the video you linked to - the Bailey's and Cohen got together to comment on a couple of JJ's video clips. At some point JJ held up some bound papers saying something about the other types of proof pointing in the direction of an infectious agent. I wish he would sit down with them and hash it out, but it would be easier for him if it is one-on-one or one on two so he isn't so outnumbered, and maybe that would relax any dissonance that might be a rising in him. Or maybe sometime JJ could make a video presentation on the tangential proof.
Milton Rosenau, Spanish flu (1918) experiment:
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/flu/3750flu.0016.573
This is an interesting read, but if you want to go straight to the summary of rosenau’s experiment, scroll to bottom and then go up to the epidemiological section. That’s where they chose to bury Milton rosenaus important (non)findings on contagion of what was supposed to be the most contagious disease in modern history. The summary is toward the end of the 2nd to last “chapter” of this report. You will find it if you look.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862332/#B69
Wow, that's a great article. I'd heard of that experiment.
After reading the whole article on trying to culture bacteria in those infected and not having evidence that a vaccine works... it makes me see absolutely nothing has changed in Western germ theory thought re respiratory illness! At least nothing is changing in the narrative about respiratory illness.
As I understand it, the over-prescribing of aspirin during the "terrible Spanish flu pandemic that killed less than 1% of the US population" contributed to people's deaths as well.
And since JC’s opinion/interpretation of the dogma (aka, “the science”) is the topic, here’s an update from Christine Massey (thanks Christine). Clearly JC is wrestling with his own cognitive dissonance!
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/jay-couey-admits-no-virus-people
Thanks for Christine's post. I think she's right, JJ is straddling the line between virus and no virus. He talked with someone else in a video about it, and referenced tangential evidence of viruses to support his use of the term virus. But he got a little heated, so I think he is struggling with the dissonance.
What if we used these three terms interchangeably - virus, infectious agent, genetic material.
This is the nuanced line being straddled. Let's exchange the word "virus" for "infectious agent" - meaning that something can be passed from one person to another, making them ill (whether it be a toxic substance or biological material). An example that people experience is the chickenpox. Can you explain the chicken pox, and how easily it spreads from child to child, without the concept of an infectious agent? I'm not sure terrain theory can explain this, since in my understanding people in different in terrains around the world get chicken pox. What do you think?
People around the world also repeatedly experience being around others who are sick without getting sick themselves. When people don't get sick from someone else's "infectious agent" they chalk it up to their immune system or not being exposed enough, not to the understanding that the person could just be detoxing and can't spread anything to another person.
In the west germ theory is stuck in people's minds so solidly that it's hard for them to even consider a conversation that leads with "viruses don't exist". So they need a bridge into this conversation. In my third substack I attempted to bridge was use the term "genetic material" in exchange for "virus and infectious agent." (I pointed out that it's really genetic material being measured, not viruses being isolated). It's genetic material that the PCR test is picking up on, and JJ Couey is calling that "virus". See if you think my third sub stack is a good bridge between the no virus people and the "infectious agent" people (infectious agent people are people who know viruses have not been proven to exist but think there are occasional infectious agents that can spread from person to person).
https://soulbee3.substack.com/p/jj-couey-makes-a-nuanced-but-complex
I've got to start my work day but I'll take a look at your measles paper in the next few days. 👍🏽
Oh I wanted to also comment on chicken pox, which is something I have thought about too. I honestly do not know why chicken pox happens and appears to affect kids in clusters ie it looks to be “infectious”. The most important thing we can do if we want to understand it from a scientific approach is scientific experimentation. To my knowledge, there is no scientific evidence that chicken pox is caused by “virus” which is what we are told. So again, holding the virologists who gave us the “virus” explanation for chicken pox, we need to see the scientific methods they have used to prove that a “virus” is the “infectious agent” responsible for “transmission” of this disease. To my knowledge, there are not scientific experiments or studies that we can look at and then say, oh yes, there’s the scientific proof that chicken pox is a transmissible disease caused by virus, AND we can see that proper controls were also conducted to rule out possible causes other than the independent variable in question.
So I remain very interested in the true cause of chicken pox, but there’s no reason for me or anyone to conclude it’s a “virus” until the scientific method proves that. Why should any scientist accept an explanation not supported by valid scientific methods?
Sam bailey has a pretty good video dedicated to chicken pox which I’ll link in a moment.
It's fascinating to consider... Like does the human species - human body have something we are physically born with that needs to detox or express at some point of our lives. Like some anomaly that happens to be in the human physical population these past 100 to 200 years... It doesn't even have to necessarily be a biological agent...
Thank you for your thoughtful response and questions for my consideration. I have not read your Substack link you posted but I will do so and then I’ll respond with my thoughts on that. I understand what you are saying, and I appreciate you are trying to bring the “sides” closer together so we can either agree or just continue the conversation/debate on “virus”. I have wondered about interchanging the word “virus” for the word “devil” so that people can see how ridiculous it is to assert the “devil” is the cause of illness. We can go to the scientific papers written and read them as “‘the devil’ isolated in the first us Covid patient” and then see how they isolated the devil in the methods section. It’s really that ridiculous because everyone would say, “how do you know that particle in the EM is “the devil?” And no one would respond, “because we know the disease is caused by “the devil” and we know that ‘the devil’ is present when we observe CPE in vitro…and our in silico sequencing tells us the genetic sequence’ of ‘the devil’ which we then confirmed is in fact ‘the devil’ via PCR, which used primers derived of pure ‘devil’ isolates!” And we would say, can you show us how you got those pure “isolates”? And the devologists would say, “we isolated the devil and that’s where the isolates come from.” Or they would say, “oh my, those devil isolates are so dangerous that only the cdc is allowed to have them in top secret safety laboratories…but they gave us the sequence from which we derived partial sequences of the whole devil genome…” This is the nonsense we have listened to when we have asked questions about “virus” isolation, and yet, if we replace “devil” for “virus” everyone agrees it’s absolutely absurd circular reasoning nonsense anti science.
What really is interesting is the dogma is so powerful that even my close and intelligent friends who trust me will understand and agree that virus hasn’t been proven…But then they say, we’ll if you cannot tell me what caused the illness, then it must be “virus”! And I say, “why do we make the unproven hypothesis the default explanation when we cannot provide a “better” answer to an interesting and important question: what caused disease?
I have said this to some friends:
If your lamp goes out and you declare the electrical grid is down, I can easily demonstrate that your declaration is incorrect by flipping on another lamp in the house. (The grid is not down). Then if you say, well, you have not told me why the lamp went out, therefore the grid is down because you haven’t provided a better explanation. Everyone would agree that “the grid is down” is the hypothesis proven wrong, AND importantly, without the need for a lamp specialist to give us the precise explanation. No, we simply say, well it cannot possibly be the electrical grid. Amazingly, it’s not that logical for people when it comes to viruses and devils because the dogma is powerful.
We need to hold virologists to their own definition of “virus”. If we start playing around with definition exchange and modification, then we end up more trouble like selling “gene therapy” as “vaccine.”
But I get your point and I do appreciate what you are trying to do, which I think is bring people together. Thank you for this, and please continue.
😄 yes, the devil and disease!
I think the viral cause of disease hangs on so concretely in people's minds because of how we experience cause and effect in their lives. I turn the key, the car starts, I turn on the faucet, the water runs, I flip the switch, light appears from the lamp (unless the grid is out). This very simple cause and effect that is such a fundamental and infinitely repeated part of our physical lives powerfully lends itself to subconsciously believing - I breathe in a germ and I get sick.
Here’s Sam on chicken pox. It’s one of dozens of brilliant presentations please watch:
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/chickenpox-parties-and-varicella-zoster-virus/
Cool, I look forward to watching.
Reposting a link I intended to share earlier. Anyone interested in Stefan Lanka’s laboratory research results will want to read and understand the implications:
https://brandfolder.com/s/7z5mpjg6nq8xn773pt8nkrbb
Here’s an interesting study for anyone who thinks sequencing is “proof” of “virus”
https://brandfolder.com/s/7z5mpjg6nq8xn773pt8nkrbb
I think this is one of the most dangerous concepts coming down the pike - that genetic material will be equated with illness and infectivity.
I’ve been following Couey for a while and find him to be the brightest light in the darkness we’ve been in the last three years. I hope he gains traction. He needs more exposure. It’d be nice if Joe Rogan would feature him on his podcast.
I feel the same way. More and more people know about him, Tessa just posted a great conversation with him. Being on Joe Rogan would be optimal for sure! 😄. Joe tends to be interested in scientists, and I'm not sure he's had a biologist on. He actually might be interested.
A PhD biologist like Couey is a scientist. In fact he is exactly the right kind of scientist necessary to unravel everything going on.
Not to take away from others who’ve been in the limelight but I see it akin to craftsperson’s. A plumber might very well be able to wire a light switch but all things considered I’d rather have an electrician.
The biggest problem with covid pushback, particularly in the arena of big pharma vaccines has been the fragmentation of dissidents into camps.
You’ve got the “viruses don’t exist” camp vs a legion of doctors, scientists, veterinarians, professors, and laypeople. Many positing themselves as dissidents but coming at it from wildly disparate angles.
This is utterly SELF DEFEATING.
Evil is laughing at our lack of cohesion. The more time I spend on Substack the more depressed I get.
Until the majority draw a line in the sand and say en-masse “Yeah, Jonathan Couey makes perfect sense, I stand behind him” this war will simply continue to reflect an attitude of,
“My PhDs vs your PhDs.”
While this might be good for certain mouthpieces who gain audiences based on the flavor they present. As an effective strategy against the evil in the world it goes absolutely nowhere.
Everyone needs to stand behind the same line in the sand. Otherwise the destabilizing forces that are ruining our lives will win.
Thanks for this comment. I agree that JJ Couey is a real scientist, in the real sense of what that means. Since biology is the fundamental aspect of what has happened, it's the fundamental understanding needed.
I think the things that orients all "dissidents" is the fact that we generally agree about what is happening - the word pandemic doesn't apply to what happened the last 3 years, so there is no need for a vaccine/transfection. The vaccine transfection is a new type of drug and has adverse effects. Most all of us dissidents went through some kind of stress and difficulty (or even went through hell) in choosing not to be injected. Other dissidents who did take the jab also have gone through stress, realizing they've been misled and maybe even injured. To me these basic facts connect us all to a solid rock together. When/if the shit hits the fan, now I know exactly who I want, and who I have, in my trenches. When I'm down and out and there are different organizations and people pointing a finger at me, you are there too, and I stand with you. I will not leave these fundamental principles that have defined us; standing for these principles feels defining.
From there, people have different perspectives on this and that, which I think is natural.
Meeting a like-minded community of eight people who live near me has really helped. I didn't know them before, and I feel so bonded to them now. Do you have a like-minded community around you?
My friends whom all prior to covid pretended they were gun toting constitution hugging, freedom loving, non-believers in fake news, big patriots, right? ALL folded like a cheap deck of cards and drank the covid Kool-Aid.
Not all of them HAD to take the jab but did anyway. Fortunately for myself, wife and child, all remain skeptical and unjabbed. My in-laws, sister and brother in law, their kids, and virtually all of my neighbors are sold on the pandemic fakery. They all think we’re insane.
My brothers aren’t jabbed or my neice’s. But I don’t see much of them. I’m retired but I’d say virtually all of my wife’s coworkers are bought-in. All our neighbors too.
So yeah, we are basically an island. I’ve never been so disappointed in people in my life. Due to my stance I’ve lost one friend I’ve known 25 years and the rest of my relationships aren’t the same. And I live in Ohio! Not a coastal blue state.
While I agree you are 100% correct in identifying the core drivers of people’s dissent I stand by my assertion that until there’s cohesiveness in the direction the majority take in pushing back on this madness it wont be effective.
Most of the Malone’s, Geert VB’s, Sirotkin’s, Yeadon’s, and a whole lot more appeal to the emotional side of the argument but when you distill it down none are saying what needs to be said.
The only people that fall readily to mind that are at the forefront of calling to expose the bad actors, dissect the scam, and end the injections are JFK Jr and Jonathan Couey.
Rand Paul squawks as do many others in lawmaking and scientific positions but they’re mostly ignoring VAERS, ignoring sudden deaths, ignoring all cause mortality stats, ignoring insurance stats, ignoring damning FOIA documentation.
Even Trump whom people worship like he’s their savior refuses to address anything important. On the contrary he green lighted this mess, pushed the vaccines through, and says they saved lives. Are you kidding me? Trump is untrustworthy I’m my view but fat chance you’ll get anyone on the Right to see it.
Meanwhile, Fauci recently went on record recently predicting another pandemic will hit “maybe as soon as next year.” I believe him because the smug little elf predicted the one in 2020 too. My feeling is, he’s not clairvoyant. He’s just instrumental in deliberately poisoning us.
Couey is smelling a rat. A deliberate release of dna clones in strategic locations with a media blitz and PCR tests run at a bazillion cycles to keep a manufactured plandemic going. Motivation is money and power at our expense. It makes 100% perfect sense. Seriously, it’s a crystal clear revelation that should be gaining traction everywhere.
We need to find out who these people are. How they did it. And stop them before they do it again. And they will. Because it worked. The largest wealth transfer in history. The largest single erasure of rights. The largest willingness for a nation to fall to its knees this side of winning a hot war. Why wouldn’t they do it again?
Under the circumstances there ought to be 1,000s of fired up experts seeing what’s at stake like Couey does and saying holy shit! We are in big trouble. Instead we’ve got the broken records spewing the same old useless songs over and over. Dissident warriors stick with their favorite crooners and dance to nowhere.
Yeah, I agree with how all these people acted to herd the majority into following harmful interventions and even injecting themselves with an untested pharmaceutical product. It was so disappointing for me too, to see every single friend and loved one fall for this fear mongering narrative. I just wrote another post on the basic facts that even fear-mongering narrative lovers have to agree with. I've been telling my friends these things to hopefully make a dent in time for the next supposed pandemic.
> My BS degree in Biology, minor in chemistry and 20+ year PT career in health care didn’t save me from feeling punch drunk by the complex informational landscape during the first two years of the covid viral outbreak.
Reply: You have diagnosed your problem. You don't get out in nature enough. You are recycling the "vesicles, exosomes, virions" etc. of the medical environment you are in. You need to spend much more time with your hands in an organic, regenerative garden. You need to find woods and creeks where you can drink the water. If you can find such a place (quite common when I was a child) you have found a place that will inform you. I am sure in doing what is mentioned here your view will be expanded and informed spiritually at least.
Hmmm, interesting, and strange! - how you think you know what my life is like..... If you are here to troll (I'm not sure yet), I will block you.
> My BS degree in Biology, minor in chemistry and 20+ year PT career in health care didn’t save me from feeling punch drunk by the complex informational landscape during the first two years of the covid viral outbreak.
I am not here to troll, I found your sustack watching Jay Couey, whose theory I fully embrace. I was just responding to the comment I copied. In it there is no indication of life style that is true. But if that is an indication, then that narrows the ability of nature to inform you.
I skipped the transfections. Why? No a mention of our immune system was a huge red light. I live and work in nature all my life and have a reverence for all of life. Also having read James Lovelock scientist (deceased) and his collaborator Lynn Margulis PhD (deceased) books for many years to gain understanding, I learned Gaia was/is the major reason for life on Earth. The bacteria have a 4 billion year history, humans just got started and all we can do at best is enslave life. No where at no time has a human created life. Yet we are a result of 4 billion years of Gaia. If that means I am a troll, what can I say.
Thanks for clarifying.
I never considered taking the transfection - so I didn't mean that I was confused or undecided about that part. When I said I was punch-drunk on the information, I was alluding to all the threads of info being put out there about the viral outbreak and transfections. I'm in California and my whole community believed the narrative and took the injections. There were a lot of things we were talking about, and we were discerning how we were understanding different things.
I live in a fairly rural area on a family farm, and have always been in sync with the natural world.
I live in California too in the central sierra foothills. What I have sensed or projected is that the theory of Gaia has been buried in Earth System Science. Most people today don't know anything about the Gaia Theory. Those that do, know it on the level of an AI reply. That was my first encounter with AI and that was enough.
I have heard of the idea of "thought stopper". The AI reply on Gaia was the perfect thought stopper. AI did the search so that must be all there is. But having spent years reading and re-reading the books by James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis and others I knew a great deal more an realized that AI will only give consensuses reality answers.
Gaia theory is another way of looking at the immune system. Lynn Margulis PhD said humans should not wage war on the biome (biome is Gaia in this case). Doing so would only lead to our own destruction. Today people in power have thrown her wisdom to the winds and have declared war on the biome.
My speculation projected that you know little of Gaia and thus little of the biome in your gut. Knowing about Gaia theory deeply allows us to see all of life as if not our friend, at least not our enemy. I suspect that Jay doesn't know much about Gaia, but what he does know teaches us to respect not fear nature. He stimulates us to respect and give thanks for our immune system and life.
Thank you for your patience with me. It was never my intent to troll you. I don't really know what a troll is. BE WELL.
💕 You too.
Ah, hi watcherbee, I know you from the twitch chat. Great, I hope they help. Take care.
Thanks!